Recent movies…
I’ll try to get around to writing some full reviews soon. In the meantime, a list of the recent movies I’ve watched along with some brief comments and ratings (out of 4 stars possible):
Black Snake Moan *** – An earthy, uncompromising study of redemption and salvation. Excellent performances from Samuel L. Jackson, Christina Ricci, Justin Timberlake (yes, that’s right – Justin Timberlake) and a host of supporting players, anchored by an interesting and unpredictable script. Dripping in southern atmosphere, this is a rather dark film that manages to be uplifting without cheating at the end.
Ratatouille **** – Pixar does it again. Will they ever run out of steam? Not as long as the uber-talented Brad Bird (The Iron Giant, The Incredibles) is captain of the ship. The difference between Pixar productions and nearly every other animated production? Pixar doesn’t make animated films, they make films that just happen to be animated, complete with all the traditional elements that make great films great. Ratatouille is another feather in their illustrious cap, and Bird has the surest sense of style in the business. Look for Bird to win his second Oscar this February.
Zodiac *** 1/2 – I have long panned former MTV music video director David Fincher (Alien 3, Se7en, Fight Club, Panic Room) as an overrated director who made pompously self-important, stylistically overblown films that weren’t as good as he clearly wanted us to think they were, and that are vastly overrated by his blindly loyal fans (witness the current rankings of mediocre films like Fight Club and Se7en on IMDB’s top 250 list, at #28 and #39 respectively). With Zodiac, Fincher abandons the immaturity that hobbled his previous work and produces a riveting procedural that is leaps and bounds above his other films in terms of narrative and style. For once, Fincher lets the film dictate the style, rather than the other way around, and he wisely avoids artificially dramatizing this true story, opting instead for a matter-of-fact narrative that recognizes and acknowledges the story’s inherent interest. The lack of artificial contrivances serve to make the actual depictions in the film all the more compelling, and what results is a fascinating character study of the men closest to the case. Kudos to Fincher for maximizing his talent as a filmmaker in service of the story, rather than forcing the story to service his penchant for self-indulgence as he has in the past. He directs with a sure and steady hand, discarding the absurdly attention-deficit MTV-style editing tricks that marred his previous work, and elicits sturdy, convincing performances from everyone involved in the large cast (this is Robert Downey Jr.’s best work in years). It helps that he worked from a tightly focused script that packs an incredible amount of information into an efficient 2 1/2 running time that feels half as short. This is Fincher’s best film to date, and the only one worthy of serious accolades.
Pan’s Labyrinth **** – A unique and engrossing fantasy film for adults (and I mean that – this is an R-rated film that easily deserves its rating, and is not in any way intended for the kiddies), this seems like the film that Mexican-born writer/director Guillermo del Toro was always destined to make. Full of creative imagery, Pan’s Labyrinth turns the fairy-tale genre on its ear, and brings the darker side that’s present in nearly all fairy tales front and center for intimate examination. This is a highly original experience that leaves an indelible impression long after the first viewing.

Squidly
7/28/2007
Fight Club is among my favorite films. I love that film. Se7en has it’s moments. Alien 3 was awful. Never saw Panic Room because the premise held no interest for me.
Squidly
7/28/2007
BTW, Brian and I saw “Children of Men” again on Thursday night. Second time for me, first time for him. It pretty much cemented my opinion of the film. I came away even more impressed by the art direction, pretty much flat on the plot.
seattlekarma
7/28/2007
Don’t get me wrong, I like “Fight Club” and “Se7en”, and even “Panic Room” was entertaining enough. They just could have been better, and when a director has such obvious potential, I tend to hold them to a higher standard. So I judge Fincher harder than I might judge Joe Director, if you get my drift.
(I think the first 30 minutes of “Fight Club” is brilliant, actually. The rest of the film just doesn’t live up to the first quarter.)
Paul Burns
7/30/2007
‘…and that are vastly overrated by his blindly loyal fans’
Come on now! You seem like an intelligent person, I’m sure you understand that opinions are subjective and strong comments like the aforementioned should really be used sparsely, especially when you yourself admit that the films have some merit (previous comment). Fight club is a favourite among young men (including myself), it would seem, because of the overall impression/feeling it gives and emotional chord it stirkes within them. Moviegoers, in general, don’t necessarily care too for art direction and camera angles, or the score of a movie – that is left to armchair critics, much like me and thee! ;)
Although I do agree that Fincher is very hit and miss, I just think such harsh criticism should be saved for the truly awful, rather than just something that is not your cup of tea.
Paul Burns
7/30/2007
btw, just finished watching pan’s labyrinth – excellent movie! ending i thought could have been handled slightly better but, very solid overall, surprised how it was portrayed in the media over here (UK) as it is definitely much more ‘adult’ than I expected!
seattlekarma
7/31/2007
Paul: lol, ok, it was a bit strongly worded. And I should have qualified it a bit more. I wasn’t referring to all of Fincher’s fans. Heck, I like his movies too for the most part. But there is a subsegment of his fans who seem pretty rabid, and would watch his grocery list if he filmed it. I’m talking about people who think “Alien 3″ is the best of the series, and that “The Game” was the best movie of 1997, the same year we saw “L.A. Confidential”, “In the Company of Men”, and “The Sweet Hereafter” (see http://www.panix.com/~dangelo/col26.html).
So anyway, I wasn’t trying to be “harsh”, I just wanted to contrast what I thought of his previous movies with what I thought of “Zodiac”. I have always thought Fincher is a fine director with a lot of potential, who wasn’t very self-restrained or disciplined and who tended towards the pretentious. But because I think highly of his skillset, I expect more, and so my criticism may have seemed “harsh”. With a lesser director, I wouldn’t expect as much and wouldn’t be as harsh, and I admit that prejudice freely. It’s actually a compliment to Fincher in the end.
Regarding “Pan’s Labyrinth”, how was it portrayed in the UK? Here in the US, it wasn’t marketed as a kid film and it received an R rating (Restricted to 18 and older), though there were plenty of inattentive parents who brought their young ones expecting another Harry Potter or C.S. Lewis tale. Honestly, doesn’t the adult rating clue these people in? ;)
all ps2 games
8/3/2007
all ps2 games
Really nice site you have here. Ive been reading for a while but this post made me want to say 2 thumbs up. Keep up the great work.